Selamat Menyambut Nuzul Al Quran 2021
"(Al-Quran ini) sebuah Kitab yang Kami turunkan kepadamu (dan umatmu Wahai Muhammad), -Kitab yang banyak faedah-faedah dan manfaatnya, untuk orang-orang yang berakal sempurna beringat mengambil iktibar.”
(Surah As-Sad: 29)
"Sebaik baik Kamu ialah Orang Yang Membaca Al Quran dan Mengajarkannya"
(Hadis Riwayat Abu Daud dan Tarmizi)
17 RAMADAN 1442H
#inspirasisktk
#bersamamenggapaikecemerlangan
An online search did not find any recent Malaysian court case where an individual named Yip Kum Fook was ordered to pay damages of RM40,000. The search results do, however, point to a High Court case from 2014, Embassy Court Sdn Bhd v Yip Kum Fook & Ors, which established a legal principle regarding stakeholder solicitors.
ReplyDeleteHere's what the search results found:
A High Court case from 2014 involving Yip Kum Fook In Embassy Court Sdn Bhd v Yip Kum Fook & Ors, the High Court in Kuala Lumpur ruled that a stakeholder solicitor cannot release funds without the consent of all involved parties. This case is relevant in the context of the Housing Development Act 1966. The RM40,000 figure is not mentioned in connection with this case in the search results.
Legal commentary mentions the case The 2014 case is referenced in a legal article from December 2024 to illustrate the duties of a stakeholder solicitor. The article discusses how solicitors who hold funds as part of a Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA) must act impartially as a trustee for both the developer and the purchaser.
Possible misinterpretation of information It is possible that the RM40,000 figure is related to a different aspect of this, or another, legal proceeding. Court cases are complex, and it is common for details to become mixed up over time.
For accurate details about a specific court case, it is best to consult official court records or legal news outlets.